Washington Supreme Court Upholds $81.5 Million Verdict in Mesothelioma Case
The Washington Supreme Court has reinstated an $81.5 million verdict in a wrongful death suit linked to asbestos exposure, concerning Jerry "Doy" Coogan, who died of mesothelioma. The court ruled that the appellate court overstepped its boundaries, affirming that the jury's decision should stand. The total judgment is now over $95 million due to post-judgment interest. The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of jury trials and criticized the appellate court for not respecting the trial court's evidence assessment.
- Supreme Court upheld $81.5 million verdict, reinforcing the jury's decision.
- Total judgment exceeds $95 million with post-judgment interest.
- None.
OLYMPIA, Wash., July 9, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- The Supreme Court of the state of Washington has overturned an appellate court ruling and reinstated a
"More than anything I'm grateful the court respected the decision of the jury who sacrificed months of their lives to hear about this case," says trial lawyer Jessica Dean of Dallas-based Dean Omar Branham Shirley LLP. "The message from the Supreme Court is that we trust juries to do their jobs."
The original claim was brought by the family and estate of Jerry "Doy" Coogan of Kettle Falls, Washington, who died in 2015 at the age of 67 from complications of mesothelioma, a form of cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Mr. Coogan worked for decades with asbestos-containing brake pads and other parts supplied by defendant Genuine Parts Company (NYSE:GPC) and sold through defendant National Automotive Parts Association (NAPA). Following a 12-week trial, the jury unanimously returned the
The court of appeals found that the trial court erred by excluding a defense witness, and applied what was termed its own "subjective determination" that the jury's award for Mr. Coogan's pain and suffering was excessive. Although the court did not disturb the jury's liability findings against Genuine Parts Company and NAPA, it ordered a new trial on damages.
In reversing, the Supreme Court found that the court of appeals had failed to give proper deference to the trial court's decision to exclude defendants' expert testimony as speculative and unfairly prejudicial. The Supreme Court further determined that the verdict was supported by "substantial evidence" and that the trial court had correctly rejected defendants' contention that the jury had been influenced by passion and prejudice. The court was unequivocal in its determination that "[t]here was nothing in the record unmistakably showing the jury's verdict was based on some improper consideration instead of the legally sufficient evidence."
"Trial by jury is the bedrock of our justice system," the Supreme Court wrote in its opinion. "We trust juries to render verdicts based on their assessment of the evidence according to the law as instructed by the trial court. Appellate review is appropriately limited, serving as a backstop to ensure trials are conducted fairly, the law is applied correctly, and the verdict is within the bounds of justice."
The case is Gerri Coogan et al. v. Genuine Parts Co. et al., No. 15-2-09504-3 in the Pierce County Superior Court in Tacoma. The case was tried on behalf of the Coogans by Jessica Dean and Ben Adams of Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP. Lisa Shirley of Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP, was appellate counsel.
Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP, is a nationally recognized trial firm that handles cases across the country for individuals who have suffered catastrophic injuries or have died as a result of irresponsible conduct of others. For more information, visit www.dobslegal.com.
Media Contact:
Barry Pound
800-559-4534
barry@androvett.com
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/washington-supreme-court-upholds-81-5-million-verdict-in-mesothelioma-case-301328726.html
SOURCE Dean Omar Branham Shirley
FAQ
What was the ruling of the Washington Supreme Court on July 8, 2021, regarding Genuine Parts Company (GPC)?
What was the basis for the $81.5 million verdict against GPC?
How much is the current total judgment against Genuine Parts Company after the Supreme Court ruling?
What did the Washington Supreme Court say about jury trials in its ruling?