Jury Fully Rejects SPI’s Meritless Lawsuit Against FIGS
FIGS, Inc. has achieved a significant legal victory as a jury in the United States District Court for the Central District of California ruled in its favor, rejecting all claims from Strategic Partners, Inc. (SPI). This outcome concludes a four-year litigation battle initiated by SPI aimed at hindering FIGS' market growth. Chief Legal Officer Todd Maron emphasized the verdict as a triumph for fair competition, highlighting SPI’s history of similar lawsuits against competitors.
- Jury ruled in favor of FIGS, rejecting all claims by SPI, ending a four-year legal battle.
- Outcome signifies a win for fair competition in the healthcare apparel market.
- None.
Decision follows four years of harassment through litigation by SPI
The decision by the jury follows four years of litigation pursued by SPI, one of the largest legacy players in the medical apparel market, in an attempt to stifle FIGS’ growth.
“This verdict is a powerful win, not only for FIGS, but for fair competition,” said
For more information about the meritless litigation brought by SPI, visit https://www.facts-and-figs.com/.
FIGS has been and remains focused on its mission of celebrating, empowering, and serving the extraordinary community of healthcare professionals who care for patients, cure diseases and save lives.
About FIGS
FIGS is a founder-led, direct-to-consumer healthcare apparel and lifestyle brand that seeks to celebrate, empower and serve current and future generations of healthcare professionals. We create technically advanced apparel and products for healthcare professionals that feature an unmatched combination of comfort, durability, function and style. We market and sell our products directly through our digital platform to provide a seamless experience for healthcare professionals.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20221104005216/en/
Media:
press@wearfigs.com
Source:
FAQ
What was the recent court ruling involving FIGS?
Who was involved in the litigation against FIGS?
What does the jury's decision mean for FIGS?
How long did the litigation against FIGS last?