Deciphera Pharmaceuticals Presents Results from the INTRIGUE Phase 3 Clinical Study at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Plenary Series Session
Deciphera Pharmaceuticals (DCPH) has presented results from the INTRIGUE Phase 3 study of QINLOCK in GIST patients, showing that ripretinib's efficacy is comparable to sunitinib, although it did not meet its primary endpoint for superiority in progression-free survival (PFS). The study involved 453 patients and highlighted that ripretinib had a better safety profile, with fewer severe adverse events. Notably, the objective response rate for ripretinib was 23.9% in patients with KIT exon 11 mutations, outperforming sunitinib's 14.6%. QINLOCK remains approved for use in multiple regions.
- Ripretinib demonstrated comparable efficacy to sunitinib in patients with GIST, specifically a median PFS of 8.3 months vs sunitinib's 7.0 months for those with a KIT exon 11 mutation.
- Ripretinib had a better safety profile, with fewer Grade 3-4 adverse events (41.3% vs 65.6% for sunitinib).
- Objective response rate for ripretinib was 23.9% in patients with KIT exon 11 mutations, compared to 14.6% for sunitinib.
- INTRIGUE study did not meet the primary endpoint of superiority in PFS compared to sunitinib.
- For the all-patient population, median PFS for ripretinib was 8.0 months, slightly under the 8.3 months for sunitinib.
– Efficacy Observed with QINLOCK® was Comparable to Sunitinib with a More Favorable Safety and Tolerability Profile in GIST Patients Previously Treated with Imatinib –
ASCO will be hosting a livestream event on
“Patients with GIST in the post-imatinib setting are in need of additional treatment options for their disease, and the results from INTRIGUE demonstrate that ripretinib is an active and well-tolerated agent. Although the INTRIGUE study did not meet its primary endpoint of superiority in progression-free survival versus sunitinib, the efficacy of ripretinib appears comparable to sunitinib in 2nd line patients. In addition, ripretinib had a more favorable safety profile than sunitinib with fewer Grade 3/4 adverse events and patients reported less deterioration in role functioning and several other key patient-reported outcome measures of tolerability,” said
In patients with GIST who progressed on or were intolerant to imatinib, the efficacy of QINLOCK and sunitinib were comparable, although progression-free survival (PFS) of QINLOCK as determined by independent radiologic review using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) did not meet the study’s primary endpoint of superiority compared to sunitinib. The statistical analysis plan included a hierarchical testing sequence that included evaluation of patients with a KIT exon 11 primary mutation (Exon 11) and then of the all patient (AP) population. Key highlights from the study presented today include the following:
- An international, multicenter study conducted in 122 active sites across 22 countries, 453 patients were randomized to ripretinib (n = 226; Exon 11, n = 163) or sunitinib (n = 227; Exon 11, n = 164).
- In patients with a KIT exon 11 primary mutation, ripretinib demonstrated a median PFS (mPFS) of 8.3 months compared to 7.0 months for the sunitinib arm (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.88, p=0.36). In the AP population (n=453), ripretinib demonstrated an mPFS of 8.0 months compared to 8.3 months for the sunitinib arm (HR 1.05, nominal p value=0.72).
-
In patients with a KIT exon 11 primary mutation, ripretinib demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of
23.9% (n=39 of 163) compared to14.6% (n=24 of 164) for sunitinib (nominal p value=0.03). In the AP population ripretinib demonstrated an ORR21.7% (n=49 of 226) compared to17.6% (n=40 of 227) for sunitinib (nominal p value=0.27). -
Ripretinib was generally well tolerated. Fewer patients in the ripretinib arm experienced Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events compared to sunitinib (
41.3% vs65.6% ). -
Patients receiving sunitinib were three times more likely to develop Grade 3 hypertension compared to patients receiving ripretinib (
26.7% vs.8.5% ) and patients receiving sunitinib were seven times more likely to develop Grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia compared to patients receiving ripretinib (10.0% vs.1.3% ). - Patient reported outcome measures also showed a more favorable tolerability profile for patients receiving ripretinib compared to patients receiving sunitinib. Patients receiving ripretinib experienced less deterioration in their ability to engage in either work or leisure activities during treatment and fewer patients receiving ripretinib experienced moderate to extremely large impact on their lives due to skin toxicity across treatment cycles compared to patients receiving sunitinib.
QINLOCK is approved by the
About QINLOCK (ripretinib)
QINLOCK is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor that was engineered to broadly inhibit KIT and PDGFRA mutated kinases by using a dual mechanism of action that regulates the kinase switch pocket and activation loop. QINLOCK inhibits primary and secondary KIT mutations in exons 9, 11, 13, 14, 17, and 18 involved in GIST, as well as the primary exon 17 D816V mutation2,3. QINLOCK also inhibits primary PDGFRA mutations in exons 12, 14, and 18, including the exon 18 D842V mutation, involved in a subset of GIST2,3.
About
Deciphera is a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing, and commercializing important new medicines to improve the lives of people with cancer. We are leveraging our proprietary switch-control kinase inhibitor platform and deep expertise in kinase biology to develop a broad portfolio of innovative medicines. In addition to advancing multiple product candidates from our platform in clinical studies, QINLOCK® is Deciphera’s switch control inhibitor for the treatment of fourth-line GIST. QINLOCK is approved in
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, including, without limitation, our expectations regarding QINLOCK and our INTRIGUE study. The words “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “continue,” “seek,” “target” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Any forward-looking statements in this press release are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and important factors that may cause actual events or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this press release, including, without limitation, risks and uncertainties related to our ability to provide access to QINLOCK in European countries other than
Deciphera, the Deciphera logo, QINLOCK, and the QINLOCK logo are registered trademarks of
References
- Blay JY, Serrano C, Heinrich MC et al. Ripretinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (INVICTUS): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:923–934.
- Smith B et al., Ripretinib (DCC-2618) is a switch control kinase inhibitor of a broad spectrum of oncogenic and drug-resistant KIT and PDGFRA variants. Cancer Cell 2019; 35:738–751.
-
Bauer S, Heinrich M, et al. Clinical activity of ripretinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor harboring heterogenous KIT/PDGFRA mutations in the phase 3 INVICTUS study.
Clinical Cancer Research 2021; 27:6333-6342.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220124005796/en/
Investor Relations:
Deciphera@argotpartners.com
212-600-1902
Media:
David.Rosen@argotpartners.com
212-600-1902
Source:
FAQ
What were the results of the INTRIGUE Phase 3 study involving QINLOCK (DCPH)?
How did QINLOCK perform compared to sunitinib regarding safety?
What was the objective response rate for QINLOCK in the study?
When was the INTRIGUE Phase 3 study presented?