New Study Highlights Significant Potential Medicare Savings Through Use of Castle Biosciences’ DecisionDx®-SCC Test to Guide Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Decisions in Patients with Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- None.
- None.
Insights
The utilization of DecisionDx-SCC for guiding adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) presents a case study in cost-effective healthcare delivery. By stratifying patients based on their metastatic risk, unnecessary treatments can be minimized, leading to substantial savings. The reported potential reduction in Medicare expenditures by up to $972 million annually underscores the financial impact of precision medicine. This figure is significant, considering the overall pressure on healthcare budgets. It is important to note that such savings are contingent on widespread adoption and consistent clinical application of the test.
Furthermore, the economic ripple effect of this practice could extend beyond direct cost savings. Reduced overtreatment aligns with value-based care initiatives, potentially lowering premiums and out-of-pocket expenses for patients, while also freeing up healthcare resources for other critical needs. The long-term implications may include a shift in healthcare economics towards more personalized and efficient treatment paradigms.
From an oncological perspective, the integration of DecisionDx-SCC into clinical decision-making represents a paradigm shift towards personalized medicine in the treatment of SCC. The ability to more accurately identify high-risk patients for ART based on molecular diagnostics, in addition to clinicopathologic factors, is a significant advancement in optimizing patient outcomes. Studies have shown that ART can improve survival rates for high-risk SCC patients, making the judicious selection of candidates for this therapy critical.
The reported study's findings also suggest a potential improvement in quality of life for patients who can safely forgo ART, as they would avoid the side effects and psychological burden associated with unnecessary radiation treatments. This aligns with a patient-centered care approach, emphasizing the importance of tailoring treatment to individual patient risk profiles.
The role of DecisionDx-SCC in refining the management of SCC patients is supported by a growing body of clinical evidence. This test assesses the expression of certain genes to provide a risk score for metastasis, which, when used in conjunction with traditional clinicopathologic staging, enhances the accuracy of risk stratification. This dual approach has been shown to improve upon the limitations of relying solely on clinicopathologic factors, which can sometimes lead to overtreatment.
It is essential to critically evaluate the robustness of the clinical data underpinning the utility of DecisionDx-SCC. The studies referenced have been peer-reviewed and published, lending credibility to the test's clinical relevance. However, continuous monitoring of real-world outcomes is necessary to validate these findings over time and across diverse patient populations. The impact on healthcare savings, while promising, should be viewed as a potential outcome contingent on broader clinical validation and consistent application in practice.
Study finds that using DecisionDx-SCC to guide patient selection for adjuvant radiation therapy (ART), identifying patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who can safely forgo the treatment, could result in significant savings to the healthcare system
“The implications of this study are significant, as evidenced by the opportunity to save our overburdened healthcare system hundreds of millions of dollars through use of the DecisionDx-SCC test to guide more risk-appropriate utilization of ART in patients with SCC,” said Ally‐Khan Somani, M.D., Ph.D., lead author, director of Mohs micrographic, reconstructive surgery & cutaneous oncology at SkinMD LLC, and adjunct clinical assistant professor, Department of Dermatology & Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at Indiana University School of Medicine. “Above and beyond the considerable cost savings is the potential to truly improve SCC patient care by using the test’s results to provide added confidence in decisions to forgo radiation therapy when a patient’s risk of metastasis is low.”
ART has been shown to improve outcomes for patients with SCC who have a high risk of disease progression. As such, high-risk patients are eligible for ART under relevant society guidelines, such as those provided by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN; 2024, v1). NCCN lists three levels of clinicopathologic risk factors (low, high and very high) and recommends consideration of ART for tumors that are classified as high or very high risk. While ART can benefit some patients, selecting patients based upon clinicopathologic factors alone can lead to overtreatment of certain patients who may not experience disease progression. Multiple published studies have shown that DecisionDx-SCC is a significant risk stratification factor for regional and distant metastasis and improves the identification of high-risk patients when used in combination with clinicopathologic factors or staging systems.2,3
Published studies have also demonstrated that clinicians use DecisionDx-SCC test results to guide personalized patient management decisions, such as frequency of follow-up care, surveillance imaging, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and the use of ART.4-7 Two recent studies support the test’s utility in guiding more informed decisions regarding the use of ART. The first demonstrated DecisionDx-SCC’s ability to risk-stratify a cohort of ART-eligible patients.8 The second demonstrated that DecisionDx-SCC was able to identify patients who benefitted most from ART, along with those who are less likely to show a significant benefit of ART in controlling metastatic disease progression.9
The cost savings article published in JCAD reports the significant, direct healthcare savings that could be realized in the management of SCC patients who use DecisionDx-SCC to guide decisions about ART. In the study, normalized medical claims data identified 22,917 Medicare-eligible SCC patients in
About DecisionDx®-SCC
DecisionDx-SCC is a 40-gene expression profile test that uses an individual patient’s tumor biology to predict individual risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma metastasis for patients with one or more risk factors. The test result, in which patients are stratified into a Class 1 (low), Class 2A (higher) or Class 2B (highest) risk category, predicts individual metastatic risk to inform risk-appropriate management. Peer-reviewed publications have demonstrated that DecisionDx-SCC is an independent predictor of metastatic risk and that integrating DecisionDx-SCC with current prognostic methods can add positive predictive value to clinician decisions regarding staging and management.
About Castle Biosciences
Castle Biosciences (Nasdaq: CSTL) is a leading diagnostics company improving health through innovative tests that guide patient care. The Company aims to transform disease management by keeping people first: patients, clinicians, employees and investors.
Castle’s current portfolio consists of tests for skin cancers, uveal melanoma, Barrett’s esophagus and mental health conditions. Additionally, the Company has active research and development programs for tests in other diseases with high clinical need, including its test in development to help guide systemic therapy selection for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and related conditions. To learn more, please visit www.CastleBiosciences.com and connect with us on LinkedIn, Facebook, X and Instagram.
DecisionDx-Melanoma, DecisionDx-CMSeq, DecisionDx-SCC, MyPath Melanoma, TissueCypher, IDgenetix, DecisionDx-UM, DecisionDx-PRAME and DecisionDx-UMSeq are trademarks of Castle Biosciences, Inc.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are subject to the “safe harbor” created by those sections. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning: the potential of for the use of DecisionDx-SCC to guide ART decisions for patients with SCC to result in Medicare healthcare savings of up to approximately
- Somani SK, Ibrahim SF, Tassavor M, et al. Use of the 40-gene expression profile (40-gep) test in medicare-eligible patients diagnosed with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cscc) to guide adjuvant radiation therapy (art) decisions leads to a significant reduction in healthcare costs. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2024;17(1):41–44.
- Ibrahim SF, Kasprzak JM, Hall MA, et al. Enhanced metastatic risk assessment in 218 cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with the 40-gene expression profile test. Future Oncology. 2022;18(7):833-847. doi:10.2217/fon-2021-1277
- Wysong A, Newman JG, Covington KR, et al. Validation of a 40-gene expression profile test to predict metastatic risk in localized high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(2):361-369. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.088
- Farberg AS, Hall MA, Douglas L, et al. Integrating gene expression profiling into NCCN high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma management recommendations: impact on patient management. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36(8):1301-1307. doi:10.1080/03007995.2020.1763284
- Singh G, Tolkachjov SN, Farberg AS. incorporation of the 40-gene expression profile (40-gep) test to improve treatment decisions in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) patients: case series and algorithm. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023;16:925-935. doi:10.2147/CCID.S403330
- Saleeby E, Bielinski K, Fitzgerald A, et al. A prospective, multi-center clinical utility study demonstrates that the 40-gene expression profile (40-gep) test impacts clinical management for Medicare-eligible patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine. 2022;6(6):482-496. doi:10.25251/skin.6.6.5 236
- Hooper PB, Farberg AS, Fitzgerald A, et al. Real-World evidence shows clinicians appropriately use the prognostic 40-gene expression profile (40-gep) test for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) patients. Cancer Invest. 2022;40(10):911-922. doi:10.1080/07357907.2022.2116454
- Koyfman SA, Wysong A, Arron S, et al. Improved risk stratification in an adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) eligible cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) patient population by integration of the 40-gene expression profile prognostic test (40-GEP). JCO. 2021;39(15_suppl):e21589-e21589. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e21589
- Arron ST, Canueto J, Siegel JJ, et al. Association of a 40-gene expression profile with risk of metastatic disease progression of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy. Fall Clinical Dermatology Conference, 2023.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240118223681/en/
Investor Contact:
Camilla Zuckero
czuckero@castlebiosciences.com
Media Contact:
amarshall@castlebiosciences.com
Source: Castle Biosciences Inc.
FAQ
How can using DecisionDx-SCC for ART decisions result in healthcare savings?
What are the potential benefits of using DecisionDx-SCC for SCC patient care?