CN Continues to Duck Key Issues in Voting Trust Filing with STB

Rhea-AI Summary

Canadian Pacific Railway (TSX: CP) issued a statement responding to Canadian National's (CN) recent filing with the Surface Transportation Board (STB) regarding a proposed voting trust. CP critiques CN's arguments, asserting they fail to meet the public interest test and overlook significant costs. CP emphasizes that its alternative, a CP/KCS combination, offers greater benefits without adverse public implications. As the public comment period closes, CP awaits the STB's decision, which will greatly influence North American rail competition.

Positive

• CP's proposal for a CP/KCS combination has received STB approval for a voting trust, indicating potential competitive advantage.
• The merger is projected to enhance service options and value for KCS shareholders compared to CN's proposal.

Negative

• CN's proposal is viewed as lacking public interest alignment, potentially affecting CP's market positioning.
• Challenges remain in competing with CN for KCS acquisition, risking delays in CP's strategic plans.

CN argument at close of public comment period fails to present convincing case that voting trust is in public interest

CALGARY, AB, July 7, 2021 /PRNewswire/ - Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (TSX: CP) (NYSE: CP) today issued the following statement in response to Canadian National's ("CN") filing with the Surface Transportation Board ("STB") replying to the many comments opposing CN's proposed voting trust:

CN's reply doubles down on arguments for a voting trust that CP has already shown do not meet the Board's public interest test and sweeps under the rug the many public interest costs associated with CN's proposed use of a trust. 

CN continues to try to limit the STB's discretion to determine what is in the public interest, repeating its flawed rhetoric about the Board's "narrow test" and asserting that concerns raised by "rail labor, communities and passenger rail…are not relevant to this voting trust decision." CN also repeats its false assertion that CN and CP are "identically situated" with respect to the relevant public interest factors, despite the fundamental differences in the public interest implications of their proposals that have already led the STB to subject the CN proposal to the 2001 merger rules and the elevated public test for voting trusts, pursuant to which approval shall be the "rare" exception rather than the routine. 

CP looks forward to the Board's decision on CN's proposal, which will mark the next milestone in CP's ability to present the CP/KCS alternative, which offers all the same benefits and more without any of the competitive and other costs of a CN acquisition of KCS. 

CN's reply falsely asserts that there is "no CP transaction" and that the Board would not "contrast" the CN transaction with a "hypothetical" CP/KCS transaction in any event. CN misses the point entirely: CP would not be asking the Board to "prefer" a CP/KCS transaction over a CN/KCS one, but merely revealing that the purported benefits CN is claiming for its own proposal should not be credited because they can be obtained in ways that do not harm the public interest. Though that lens, the CN/KCS deal should not be approved. 

CP looks forward to offering KCS shareholders a realistic, achievable and ultimately superior path to realize the value of their stake in this proud company.  On close inspection, CN's bid remains truly illusory. 

CP-KCS remains the only viable Class 1 combination

CP filed comments with the STB on June 28 outlining why the public interest costs of CN's proposed voting trust outweigh the non-existent benefits. With the public comment period closed, STB's subsequent deliberations will determine the course of competition for U.S. railroading and North American commerce for the next 150 years.

Importantly, the STB has already approved CP's use of a voting trust and affirmed KCS' waiver from the new rail merger rules it adopted in 2001 because a CP-KCS combination is truly end-to-end, pro-competitive, and the only viable Class 1 combination.

As previously announced, CP is continuing to pursue its application process to acquire KCS so that the pro-competitive CP-KCS combination can be reviewed by the STB and implemented without undue delay, in the event KCS' agreement with CN is terminated or CN is otherwise unable to acquire control of KCS.

For more information on the benefits of a CP-KCS combination and the risks that a CN-KCS transaction would pose to the railway industry and North America, visit FutureForFreight.com.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION  

This news release includes certain forward-looking statements and forward looking information (collectively, FLI). FLI is typically identified by words such as "anticipate", "expect", "project", "estimate", "forecast", "plan", "intend", "target", "believe", "likely" and similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook. All statements other than statements of historical fact may be FLI.  

Although we believe that the FLI is reasonable based on the information available today and processes used to prepare it, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and you are cautioned against placing undue reliance on FLI. By its nature, FLI involves a variety of assumptions, which are based upon factors that may be difficult to predict and that may involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, levels of activity and achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these FLI, including, but not limited to, the following: changes in business strategies and strategic opportunities; estimated future dividends; financial strength and flexibility; debt and equity market conditions, including the ability to access capital markets on favourable terms or at all; cost of debt and equity capital; potential changes in the CP share price; the ability of management of CP, its subsidiaries and affiliates to execute key priorities; general North American and global social, economic, political, credit and business conditions; risks associated with agricultural production such as weather conditions and insect populations; the availability and price of energy commodities; the effects of competition and pricing pressures, including competition from other rail carriers, trucking companies and maritime shippers in Canada and the U.S.; North American and global economic growth; industry capacity; shifts in market demand; changes in commodity prices and commodity demand; uncertainty surrounding timing and volumes of commodities being shipped via CP; inflation; geopolitical instability; changes in laws, regulations and government policies, including regulation of rates; changes in taxes and tax rates; potential increases in maintenance and operating costs; changes in fuel prices; disruption in fuel supplies; uncertainties of investigations, proceedings or other types of claims and litigation; compliance with environmental regulations; labour disputes; changes in labour costs and labour difficulties; risks and liabilities arising from derailments; transportation of dangerous goods; timing of completion of capital and maintenance projects; sufficiency of CP's budgeted capital expenditures in carrying out CP's business plan; services and infrastructure; the satisfaction by third parties of their obligations to CP; currency and interest rate fluctuations; exchange rates; effects of changes in market conditions and discount rates on the financial position of pension plans and investments; trade restrictions or other changes to international trade arrangements; the effects of current and future multinational trade agreements on the level of trade among Canada and the U.S.; climate change and the market and regulatory responses to climate change; anticipated in-service dates; success of hedging activities; operational performance and reliability; regulatory and legislative decisions and actions; public opinion; various events that could disrupt operations, including severe weather, such as droughts, floods, avalanches and earthquakes, and cybersecurity attacks, as well as security threats and governmental response to them, and technological changes; acts of terrorism, war or other acts of violence or crime or risk of such activities; insurance coverage limitations; and the pandemic created by the outbreak of COVID-19 and resulting effects on CP's business, operating results, cash flows and/or financial condition, as well as resulting effects on economic conditions, the demand environment for logistics requirements and energy prices, restrictions imposed by public health authorities or governments, fiscal and monetary policy responses by governments and financial institutions, and disruptions to global supply chains.   

We caution that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive and is made as of the date hereof. Additional information about these and other assumptions, risks and uncertainties can be found in reports and filings by CP with Canadian and U.S. securities regulators. Reference should be made to "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Forward-Looking Statements" in CP's annual and interim reports on Form 10-K and 10-Q. Due to the interdependencies and correlation of these factors, as well as other factors, the impact of any one assumption, risk or uncertainty on FLI cannot be determined with certainty. 

Except to the extent required by law, we assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any FLI, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All FLI in this news release is expressly qualified in its entirety by these cautionary statements. 

ABOUT CANADIAN PACIFIC 

Canadian Pacific (TSX: CP) (NYSE: CP) is a transcontinental railway in Canada and the United States with direct links to major ports on the west and east coasts. CP provides North American customers a competitive rail service with access to key markets in every corner of the globe. CP is growing with its customers, offering a suite of freight transportation services, logistics solutions and supply chain expertise. Visit www.cpr.ca to see the rail advantages of CP. CP-IR 

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cn-continues-to-duck-key-issues-in-voting-trust-filing-with-stb-301327155.html

SOURCE Canadian Pacific

FAQ

What was Canadian Pacific's response to CN's voting trust proposal?

Canadian Pacific criticized CN's arguments, stating they fail to demonstrate public interest and overlook associated costs.

How does CP's proposal compare to CN's regarding KCS?

CP maintains its KCS proposal offers superior benefits and aligns better with public interest compared to CN's approach.

What is the significance of the STB's decision on CP and CN?

The STB's decision will significantly impact competition in North American rail, influencing both CP's and CN's strategic directions.

What are the expected impacts of the CP/KCS combination?

The CP/KCS combination is projected to enhance competitive offerings and provide superior value to KCS shareholders.

When did Canadian Pacific respond to CN's proposal?

Canadian Pacific issued its response on July 7, 2021, addressing comments made during the public comment period.