Outerbridge Sets the Record Straight on Independent Nominees for Comtech Board
Outerbridge Capital Management, holding 4.9% of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. (CMTL), announced nominations for Wendi Carpenter and Sidney Fuchs to the Board of Directors amidst accusations of misleading tactics from Comtech's Board. Outerbridge emphasizes that the incumbent Board has resorted to scare tactics to prevent independent candidates from joining. The firm argues that the election of these nominees is critical for improving Comtech's governance and performance, highlighting both nominees' distinguished backgrounds in the military and intelligence.
- Outerbridge's nominees, Wendi Carpenter and Sidney Fuchs, have notable qualifications, including military and intelligence experience that can benefit Comtech.
- The proposed candidates aim to enhance Comtech's governance, potentially improving shareholder value.
- Comtech's Board has been accused of using scare tactics to undermine Outerbridge's independent nominees.
- The issuance of a dilutive PIPE transaction suggests attempts to block independent oversight and may dilute shareholder value.
Highlights Truth Regarding Numerous False, Misleading, and Reckless Statements Comtech Has Made About Outerbridge Nominees
Believes Board Has Resorted to Extreme Scare Tactics in Desperate Bid to Keep Truly Independent Directors out of the Boardroom and Avoid Accountability at All Costs
Believes Board’s Messaging About Sidelining Sidney Fuchs if He is Elected Creates Further Urgency to Elect BOTH Outerbridge Nominees to the Board
Outerbridge Urges Shareholders to Vote on the WHITE Proxy Card FOR the Election of Highly Qualified and Fully Independent Nominees
“We are highly disappointed that
As their biographies make plain,
The bottom line is that Comtech’s Board is in desperate need of refreshment with two highly qualified, fully independent candidates – Wendi and Sid – who collectively can bring the independence and relevant experience required to reverse the Company’s trend of underperformance and poor corporate governance. Such refreshment is, we believe, the only way for the Company to deliver enhanced value for shareholders.
We have no wish to engage in a public tit-for-tat exchange, but Comtech’s recent attacks on our independent nominees cannot go unanswered. We ask you to consider the following:
Facts about
-
Wendi served in the
Navy for 34 years, becoming one of the first womanNavy pilots, the first woman pilot in theNavy to achieve the rank of one and then two-star admiral, and, at the time, one of only about 20 female admirals out of 250 total. -
When the Pentagon was struck on 9/11, Wendi led the
Logistics Crisis Action Center for the Navy and was later awarded the Legion of Merit for helping theNavy to get onto an operational wartime footing. -
In Wendi’s first tour in the
U.S. Second Fleet, she was instrumental in redefiningNavy command and control and communications, spearheading acquisition of much needed specialty communications equipment that worked seamlessly with theU.S. Army ,U.S. Air Force , andU.S. Marine Corps . -
As a Rear Admiral and Deputy Commander of the
U.S. Second Fleet, and later as Commander of the Navy Warfare Development Command, Wendi not only drove key innovation, development, and acquisition in satellites, cybersecurity, communications, and unmanned systems, but also supported civilian and military authorities in the wake of disasters including the 2010Haiti earthquake, the 2011 Japanese tsunami, and Hurricane Sandy when she was President ofNew York Maritime College and had a two-star appointment as aMerchant Marine officer. - Wendi is also a fully joint qualified officer and served with distinction at Joint Forces Command where she spearheaded the strategic planning for the refresh of cyber capability and related security systems. She is authorized to wear some 12 personal awards, as well as the Maritime Administration’s award for her work after Hurricane Sandy, because of her exceptional success in leading large, complex organizations in challenging global environments.
Wendi’s deep knowledge of human capital management, operations, supply chain and logistics, her hands-on experience working with communications equipment, including satellite and complex systems, in addition to her experience in government contracting, acquisition and R&D, and success “managing up” within a male-dominated organization, more than qualify her to serve on Comtech’s Board. Wendi has the skills, experience, and independence required to zealously represent
Comtech’s recent allegations that
-
Potential conflicts come up from time to time in the boardroom and, as such, a Board should be equipped to deal with them via a customary Organizational Conflict of Interest (“OCI”) mitigation plan. OCI firewalls are common practice in Comtech’s industries and Sid has experience setting up OCI mitigation plans at every company he has led or been a part of. If
Comtech currently does not have such an OCI mitigation plan, it simply testifies to the incumbent Board’s lack of relevant industry expertise; with that said, Sid could readily work with the Board to develop and implement an appropriate plan. -
Leading proxy advisory firm
Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) did not give Comtech’s “conflict” arguments any credence, stating, “Sidney Fuchs appears to have relevant industry and M&A experience, which outweigh concerns raised by the [C]ompany regarding potential conflicts related to his chairmanship of Eutelsat America.”1 ISS further noted that Sid’s eight-year tenure as a CIA intelligence officer signifies that he has adequate experience dealing with sensitive information. If theU.S. Department of Defense and the Intelligence Community can trust Sid with the highest level of clearances and the handling of very sensitive and compartmented information for the past 34 years without interruption,Comtech should do the same. -
Eutelsat America Corporation (“EAC”) is the American subsidiary ofEutelsat SA (ETL.PA), a leadingParis -based satellite services and communications provider with over1.2 billion euros in annual revenue. EAC has its ownU.S. Board of Directors, which Sid chairs, and everybody on that board holdsU.S. security clearances. This structure satisfies theU.S. Government’s security requirements for foreign ownership, which demands that security and OCI firewalls are in place and maintained appropriately. -
When viewed objectively, Sid’s highly relevant experience and broad professional network in Comtech’s core end markets is actually a key strength. Unlike Comtech’s independent Board, which cannot truly understand the complex markets the Company serves due to its lack of expertise, Sid understands that companies in these dynamic end markets may be competitors one day, and partners the next. By accessing Sid’s extensive network in the satellite, government, and public safety sectors,
Comtech could potentially garner strategic opportunities, new customers, and additive partnerships, all of which would increase shareholder value. -
Finally, and as we have stated previously, Sid could easily recuse himself from any sensitive conversations, as he has done on occasion in the past in his other board roles. But it is beyond ridiculous for
Comtech to state that this would mean Sid would have to recuse himself from so many Board meetings that “it would likely be equivalent to his not serving on the Board at all.”2 In fact, this telegraphs the current Board’s intention to suppress Sid’s Board participation if he becomes a director – which is another reason why it is critical for shareholders to elect both Outerbridge director nominees to effect needed change atComtech and to ensure shareholder interests remain paramount in the boardroom.
Ultimately, what is clear here is that Comtech’s long-tenured management team, two of whom will sit on the Company’s Board, do not want to be held accountable. The Company is deeply concerned about the arrival of industry experts in the boardroom that have the independence required to represent Comtech’s shareholders instead of protecting the interests of its entrenched executive team. That is why they have stacked the Board with individuals that lack relevant experience in Comtech’s core markets and that have longstanding personal relationships with other directors. Wendi and Sid have the requisite knowledge and independence to ask the right questions, demand good answers, and help guide the Company to the next level on behalf of all shareholders.”
Vote on the WHITE proxy card to elect Outerbridge’s highly qualified and fully independent nominees to the Comtech Board.
About
___________________________
1 Permission to quote from the ISS report was neither sought nor received.
2 Comtech Press Release,
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211209005631/en/
Investor contact:
Chief Investment Officer
(347) 493-0350
rory@outerbridgecapital.com
info@outerbridgecapital.com
OR
(212) 468-5384 / (212) 468-5380
jkovler@harkinskovler.com / rwareham@harkinskovler.com
Media contact:
dzacchei@sloanepr.com / jgermani@sloanepr.com
Source:
FAQ
What is Outerbridge Capital's stance on Comtech Telecommunications Corp. (CMTL) nominees?
What percentage of Comtech does Outerbridge Capital manage?
When is the Comtech Annual Meeting for shareholder voting?
What allegations has Outerbridge made against Comtech's Board?