Outerbridge Issues Presentation Refuting Comtech’s False and Misleading Claims
Outerbridge Capital Management, holding a 4.9% stake in CMTL, has nominated Wendi Carpenter and Sidney Fuchs for election to the board during the Annual Meeting on December 17, 2021. The firm criticized Comtech’s board for conflicts of interest and inadequate oversight, citing a decline in shareholder value and poor capital decisions. Outerbridge urged shareholders to vote for its nominees to ensure strategic review and better governance, especially in light of an unsolicited acquisition offer from Acacia at a significant premium to market value.
- Outerbridge's nominees, Wendi Carpenter and Sidney Fuchs, have extensive M&A and industry experience that could enhance board oversight.
- The nomination could potentially lead to a robust strategic review process for Comtech and improve shareholder value.
- Comtech's board has been accused of significant shareholder value destruction and poor capital allocation decisions.
- The board's perceived conflicts of interest and lack of independence raise concerns over management's future performance.
- Failure to engage in a genuine strategic review could lead to an 18% downside in share price, reverting to pre-Acacia offer levels.
Believes Change is Urgently Needed to Bring Relevant Experience and Real Independence to Comtech’s Board
Details Conflicts of Interest Among Current Directors and Company’s Ceaseless Attempts at Entrenchment – Including a Deeply Flawed Board “Refreshment” Process
Urges Shareholders to Vote on the White Proxy Card for the Election of Highly Qualified and Fully Independent Nominees
The presentation is available here and additional materials are available at: https://www.restorecomtech.com/stockholder-materials.
The presentation highlights the following:
- Change is urgently needed to bring critical relevant experience to the boardroom. Despite Comtech’s misleading and false claims of business momentum, the Board has in fact overseen significant shareholder value destruction, is cherry-picking data in its characterization of total shareholder return (“TSR”), and has made disastrous capital allocation decisions.
-
Comtech’s Board is riddled with conflicts and focused on entrenchment. The Company’s sham CEO succession process appears to be focused on keeping Chairman and CEO
Fred Kornberg and incoming CEOMichael Porcelain , a long-time underperformingComtech executive, in control. This speaks to the Board’s lack of independence and oversight, especially considering issues surroundingMr. Kornberg such as the loss of his security clearance, excessive compensation, and related party transactions, and Comtech’s long-time underperformance under the leadership of Messrs. Porcelain and Kornberg. As we learned from the recent consummation of the dilutive PIPE transaction – through which ALL Comtech directors are inextricably linked – this Board will not hesitate to put its own self-preservation ahead of its duties and obligation to shareholders.
-
Comtech’s Board “refreshment” process was deeply flawed. Outerbridge’s presentation details how recently added directors
Lisa Lesavoy andJudy Chambers appear to be grossly underqualified to serve asComtech directors, and two directors are being added following the Annual Meeting and are therefore not subject to a shareholder vote.
-
Shareholders must act now to ensure a robust strategic review and minimize downside risk from a flawed process.
Comtech is at a critical juncture with respect to its business transformation, growth strategy, and, most importantly, review of the unsolicited Acacia offer, which represented a39% premium to Comtech’s unaffected share price. A long-term underperforming management team, coupled with a Board severely lacking in industry, M&A, strategic, and turnaround experience, significantly increases the risk ofComtech running a flawed process with respect to the Acacia offer. In 2014, the same management team led by current CEOFred Kornberg and CEO-electMichael Porcelain concluded that remaining independent was the best course of action. Since then,Comtech generated TSR of negative32% versus168% for Comtech’s peer median,135% for the S&P 500, and95% for the Nasdaq Telecom Index.1,2 IfComtech fails to conduct a bona fide strategic review process and decides to remain independent while pursuing the same failed strategies that have destroyed shareholder value, Comtech’s share price could fall back to where it was prior to Acacia’s offer – a18% downside from current levels. The risk of getting it wrong is high.
-
Outerbridge nominees
Wendi Carpenter andSidney Fuchs are the right choice for Comtech’s Board. Despite the Company’s desperate attempts to smear their names and fabricate “conflicts”, these nominees collectively possess extensive M&A and industry experience and impeccable civilian and military backgrounds that position them well to bring improved oversight and independence to Comtech’s Board and help create value for shareholders. Shareholders deserve directors like Wendi and Sid that welcome shareholder engagement, rather than a Board that views such engagement, asComtech recently put it, as “wasting [its] time.”3
Vote on the WHITE proxy card to elect Outerbridge’s highly qualified and fully independent nominees to the Comtech Board.
About
1 Source: FactSet, Data as of
2
3 Comtech Press Release, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211129005215/en/ (11/29/21)
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211201005569/en/
Investor:
Chief Investment Officer
(347) 493-0350
rory@outerbridgecapital.com
info@outerbridgecapital.com
OR
(212) 468-5384 / (212) 468-5380
jkovler@harkinskovler.com / rwareham@harkinskovler.com
Media:
dzacchei@sloanepr.com / jgermani@sloanepr.com
Source:
FAQ
What is Outerbridge's stake in Comtech (CMTL)?
Who has Outerbridge nominated for the Comtech board?
When is the Comtech Annual Meeting for shareholders?
Why does Outerbridge believe Comtech needs a board change?