Celsion Corporation Reports Second Quarter 2020 Financial Results and Provides Business Update
Celsion Corporation (NASDAQ: CLSN) reported financial results for Q2 2020, with a net loss of $5.3 million ($0.18 per share), down from $5.9 million in Q2 2019. The company is advancing its clinical programs, particularly the promising Phase II OVATION 2 Study of GEN-1 in advanced ovarian cancer, where enrollment of 105 patients is expected to complete by Q2 2021. Following a recommendation to stop the Phase III OPTIMA Study, the company will continue monitoring patients for overall survival, indicating potential data maturity issues. Celsion ended Q2 2020 with $25.5 million in cash and securities.
- Initiation of Phase II OVATION 2 Study with GEN-1 shows encouraging results and is ahead of schedule.
- Celsion expects enrollment completion in the OVATION 2 Study by Q2 2021.
- Strong progression-free survival signals in the OVATION 2 Study compared to synthetic control arm.
- Cash position of $25.5 million supports operations until Q4 2021.
- Independent DMC recommended considering stopping the Phase III OPTIMA Study due to crossing the futility boundary.
- The p-value of 0.524 raises uncertainty about the OPTIMA Study results.
- Recent patient death patterns in the OPTIMA Study raise concerns about data maturity.
Initiates Promising Phase II Study of GEN-1 in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Will Continue Following Patients in Phase III OPTIMA Study for Overall Survival;
Data Maturity at Issue
Conference Call Begins Today at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time
LAWRENCEVILLE, N.J, Aug. 14, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Celsion Corporation (NASDAQ: CLSN), an oncology drug development company, today announced financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, and provided an update on clinical development programs with GEN-1, its DNA-mediated IL-12 immunotherapy currently in Phase II development for the treatment of advanced stage ovarian cancer, and ThermoDox®, its proprietary heat-activated liposomal encapsulation of doxorubicin currently in Phase III development for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, or primary liver cancer.
“GEN-1, our oncology-focused immunotherapy, continues to show encouraging results at the 100 mg/m² dose cohort in the OVATION 2 Study, which is consistent with the results reported from our earlier Phase Ib trial (the OVATION 1 Study) in advanced-stage ovarian cancer. In June 2020, the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) for the OVATION 2 Study recommended that the Phase II portion of the OVATION Study proceed with the dose of 100 mg/m2,” reported Michael H. Tardugno, Celsion’s chairman, president and chief executive officer. “These findings were reinforced by strong progression-free survival (PFS) when comparing study patients to a statistically validated synthetic control arm (SCA) of matched patients from prior studies. In July 2020, we announced the randomization of the first two patients in the Phase II OVATION 2 Study. This milestone was achieved approximately five months ahead of our previously announced schedule. We have a very aggressive recruitment program and anticipate completing enrollment of 105 patients in the second quarter of 2021. Importantly, as an open-label study, clinical updates will be provided throughout the course of treatment including response rates and surgical resection scores,” Mr. Tardugno added.
Continuing his comments, Mr. Tardugno noted, “In early July, Celsion received a wholly unexpected recommendation from the independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) to consider stopping the global Phase III OPTIMA Study. This recommendation was made following the DMC’s second pre-planned interim safety and efficacy analysis of the OPTIMA Study on July 9, 2020. The DMC’s analysis found that the pre-specified boundary for stopping the trial for futility of 0.900 was crossed with an actual value of 0.903. However, the p-value of 0.524 for this analysis provides a high level of uncertainty as to the actual hazard ratio value, therefore, the DMC left the final decision of whether to stop the OPTIMA Study to the Company.
Mr. Tardugno further stated, “This development had never been anticipated by the Company or our advisors, nor would it have been forecasted by the first pre-planned efficacy analysis. Further, blinded data available to the Company appeared to be tracking well against the sub-group analysis of the Company’s earlier HEAT Study, upon which the OPTIMA Study is based.”
In early August, after conducting additional analyses of the unblinded data from the second pre-planned interim analysis, the Company announced plans to continue following patients for overall survival (OS), noting that the unexpected and marginally crossed futility boundary, suggested by the Kaplan-Meier analysis at the second interim analysis, may be associated with a data maturity issue. Additionally, Celsion reported that it is sending all clinical trial data, including Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) data, to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for independent analysis, including computed tomography (CT) scans for NIH’s evaluation of PFS. Depending on the trends noted during the OS follow-up period, Celsion may choose to discontinue the Study at any time. The Company also notes that the vast majority of expenses related to the OPTIMA Study already have been incurred.
Recent Developments
GEN-1 Immunotherapy
Initiation of Phase II OVATION 2 Study in Advanced Ovarian Cancer. In July 2020, the Company announced the randomization of the first two patients in the Phase II portion of the OVATION 2 Study with GEN-1 in advanced ovarian cancer. The Company anticipates completing enrollment of up to 118 patients in the second quarter of 2021. Because this is an open-label study, clinical updates will be provided throughout the course of treatment including response rates and surgical resection scores.
The OVATION 2 Study combines GEN-1 with standard-of-care neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients newly diagnosed with Stage III/IV ovarian cancer. NACT is designed to shrink the cancer as much as possible for optimal surgical removal after three cycles of chemotherapy. Following NACT, patients undergo interval debulking surgery, followed by three adjuvant cycles of chemotherapy and up to nine additional weekly GEN-1 treatments, the goal of which is to delay progression and improve OS. The OVATION 2 Study is an open-label, 1-to-1 randomized trial,
DSMB Recommends GEN-1 to Proceed to Phase II of the OVATION 2 Study in Advanced Ovarian Cancer. In May 2020, the Company announced the final recommendations of the DSMB following completion of the Phase I dose-finding and tolerance portion of the OVATION 2 Study with GEN-1 in advanced (Stage III/IV) ovarian cancer. Based on favorable safety data from 15 randomized patients, the DSMB recommended that the Phase II portion of the OVATION Study proceed with the dose of 100 mg/m2. The DSMB also determined that safety is satisfactory with an acceptable risk/benefit, and that patients tolerate up to 17 doses of GEN-1 during a course of treatment that lasts up to six months. No dose limiting toxicities were reported.
In March 2020, the Company announced the following clinical development achievements for GEN-1:
● | Highly encouraging initial clinical data from the first 15 patients enrolled in the ongoing Phase I/II OVATION 2 Study for patients newly diagnosed with Stage III and IV ovarian cancer. GEN-1 plus standard NACT produced positive dose-dependent efficacy results, with no dose-limiting toxicities, which correlates well with successful surgical outcomes as summarized below: | ||
o | Of the 15 patients treated in the Phase I portion of the OVATION 2 Study, nine were treated with GEN-1 at a dose of 100 mg/m² plus NACT and six were treated with NACT only. All 15 had successful resections of their tumors, with seven out of nine patients ( | ||
o | When combining these results with the surgical resection rates observed in the Company’s prior Phase Ib dose-escalation trial (the OVATION 1 Study), a population of patients with inclusion criteria identical to the OVATION 2 Study, the data reflect the strong dose-dependent efficacy of adding GEN-1 to the current standard of care NACT: |
% of Patients with | ||||||
R0 Resections | ||||||
0, 36, 47 mg/m² of GEN-1 plus NACT | n=12 | 42 | % | |||
61, 79, 100 mg/m² of GEN-1 plus NACT | n=17 | 82 | % |
● | Medidata-matched patient data from a SCA compared with results from the Phase Ib dose-escalating OVATION 1 Study with GEN-1 in Stage III/IV ovarian cancer patients showed positive results in PFS. The HR was 0.53 in the intent-to-treat group, showing strong signals of efficacy. Medidata is a globally recognized leader in clinical data management. GEN-1’s strong and encouraging treatment effect, evidenced by the SCA, suggests a potentially remarkable improvement in PFS, an FDA-recognized surrogate for OS, and appears to confirm the science behind IL-12’s ability to recruit the innate and adaptive elements of the immune system to fight malignancies. The strong PFS trend is supported by previously published translational data that clearly demonstrate the pro-immune changes in the tumor microenvironment associated with loco-regional GEN-1 therapy. PFS data generated from this analysis comparing GEN-1 with SCA showed the following: |
GEN-1 Population | PFS Hazard Ratio (Confidence Interval) | |
Intent-to-treat, n=15 | 0.53 ( | |
Per-protocol, n=14 | 0.33 ( |
● | The European Medicines Agency (EMA) Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products recommended that GEN-1 be designated as an orphan medicinal product for the treatment of ovarian cancer. As established by the EMA, this designation provides for scientific advice and certain regulatory assistance during the product development phase, direct access to centralized marketing authorization and certain financial incentives for companies developing new therapies intended for the treatment of a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects no more than five in 10,000 people in the European Union. GEN-1 previously received orphan drug designation from the FDA. |
ThermoDox®
Patients in Phase III OPTIMA Study Will Continue to be Followed for Overall Survival. In August 2020, the Company provided an update on its ongoing review of unblinded data from the second pre-planned interim analysis of the global Phase III OPTIMA Study. The Company announced it will continue following patients for OS, noting that the unexpected and marginally crossed futility boundary suggested by the Kaplan-Meier analysis at the second interim analysis on July 9, 2020 may be associated with a data maturity issue. The Company further notes that 26 consecutive patient deaths represented exclusively in the second analysis behave far differently from the balance of the patients who have died as of that date. Removing the 26 consecutive patient deaths, which occurred between September 2019 and March 2020, from the pre-planned interim analysis suggests that the OPTIMA Study OS pattern is similar to the prospective HEAT Study subgroup upon which the OPTIMA Study is based, at the approximate comparable point in time. In addition, subsequent to the second interim analysis there were eight patient deaths in a 3:1 ratio of control arm to treatment arm patients, which further supports a concern for data maturity.
It was further noted that OPTIMA Study sites in China and Vietnam, which enrolled over
Recommendation from the Independent DMC to Consider Stopping the Phase III OPTIMA Study of ThermoDox® in Primary Liver Cancer. In July 2020, the Company announced that it received a recommendation from the independent DMC to consider stopping the global Phase III OPTIMA Study. The recommendation was made following the second pre-planned interim safety and efficacy analysis by the DMC on July 9, 2020. The DMC analysis found that the pre-specified boundary for stopping the trial for futility of 0.900 was crossed with an actual value of 0.903. However, the p-value of 0.524 for this analysis provides uncertainty; subsequently, the DMC left the final decision of whether or not to stop the OPTIMA Study to Celsion. There were no safety concerns noted during the interim analysis.
The statistical plan for the OPTIMA Study included two interim efficacy analyses by the DMC. The first interim analysis was announced in November 2019 following data lock in August 2019 after the prescribed minimum number of 128 patient events (deaths) was reached, and the second interim analysis was conducted on July 9, 2020 following data lock in April 2020 after the prescribed minimum number of 158 events was reached.
Corporate Developments
Strengthened Balance Sheet Through a
Received
Second Quarter Financial Results
For the quarter ended June 30, 2020, Celsion reported a net loss of
The Company ended the second quarter of 2020 with
Research and development expenses decreased
General and administrative expenses were
In connection with the Company’s venture debt facility with Horizon entered in late June 2018, the Company incurred interest expense of
Six Month Financial Results
For the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company reported a net loss of
Net cash used for operating activities was
Research and development expenses decreased
Other expenses during the first half of 2020 included a non-cash charge of
Second Quarter Conference Call
The Company will host a conference call to provide a business update and discuss its second quarter 2020 financial results at 11:00 a.m. EDT today. To participate in the call, interested parties may dial 1-800-353-6461 (Toll-Free/North America) or 1-334-323-0501 (International/Toll) 10 minutes before the call is scheduled to begin, and ask for the Celsion Corporation Second Quarter 2020 Earnings Call (Conference Code: 4777957). The call will also be broadcast live on the internet at www.celsion.com. The call will be archived for replay through August 28, 2020. The replay can be accessed at 1-719-457-0820 or 1-888-203-1112 using Conference ID: 4777957. An audio replay of the call will also be available on the Company’s website, www.celsion.com, for 90 days after 2:00 p.m. EDT Friday, August 14, 2020.
About Celsion Corporation
Celsion is a fully integrated oncology company focused on developing a portfolio of innovative cancer treatments, including immunotherapies, DNA-based therapies and directed chemotherapies. The Company’s product pipeline includes GEN-1, a DNA-based immunotherapy for the localized treatment of ovarian cancer and ThermoDox®, a proprietary heat-activated liposomal encapsulation of doxorubicin, currently in Phase III development for the treatment of primary liver cancer and in development for other cancer indications. Celsion has two feasibility stage platform technologies for the development of novel nucleic acid-based immunotherapies and other anti-cancer DNA or RNA therapies. Both are novel synthetic, non-viral vectors with demonstrated capability in nucleic acid cellular transfection. For more information on Celsion, visit: http://www.celsion.com. (CLSN-FIN).
Celsion wishes to inform readers that forward-looking statements in this release are made pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Readers are cautioned that such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, unforeseen changes in the course of research and development activities and in clinical trials; the uncertainties of and difficulties in analyzing interim clinical data; the significant expense, time, and risk of failure of conducting clinical trials; the need for Celsion to evaluate its future development plans; possible acquisitions or licenses of other technologies, assets or businesses; possible actions by customers, suppliers, competitors, regulatory authorities; and other risks detailed from time to time in Celsion’s periodic reports and prospectuses filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Celsion assumes no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events, new information or otherwise.
Celsion Investor Contact
Jeffrey W. Church
609-482-2455
jchurch@celsion.com
LHA Investor Relations
Kim Sutton Golodetz
212-838-3777
kgolodetz@lhai.com
[Tables to Follow]
Celsion Corporation
Condensed Statements of Operations
(in thousands except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||
Licensing revenue | $ | 125 | $ | 125 | $ | 250 | $ | 250 | ||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 2,991 | 3,558 | 6,043 | 6,326 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 1,901 | 2,137 | 3,740 | 4,354 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 4,892 | 5,695 | 9,783 | 10,680 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations | (4,767 | ) | (5,570 | ) | (9,533 | ) | (10,430 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||
(Loss) gain from change in valuation of earn-out milestone liability | (256 | ) | (127 | ) | (298 | ) | 2,600 | |||||||||
Fair value of warrants issued in connection with amendment to modify GEN-1 earn-out milestone payment | - | - | - | (400 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense, investment income and other income (expense), net | (320 | ) | (208 | ) | (569 | ) | (442 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income (expense), net | (576 | ) | (335 | ) | (867 | ) | 2,158 | |||||||||
Net loss | $ | (5,343 | ) | $ | (5,904 | ) | $ | (10,400 | ) | $ | (8,272 | ) | ||||
Net loss per common share Basic and diluted | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (0.37 | ) | $ | (0.42 | ) | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding Basic and diluted | 29,887 | 20,606 | 27,831 | 19,713 |
Celsion Corporation
Selected Balance Sheet Information
(in thousands)
June 30, 2020 (Unaudited) | December 31, 2019 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 22,654 | $ | 6,875 | ||||
Investment securities and interest receivable on investment securities | 2,799 | 8,007 | ||||||
Advances, deposits on clinical programs and other current assets | 1,343 | 1,353 | ||||||
Total current assets | 26,796 | 16,235 | ||||||
Property and equipment | 339 | 405 | ||||||
Other assets | ||||||||
Deferred tax asset | -– | 1,820 | ||||||
In-process research and development | 15,736 | 15,736 | ||||||
Goodwill | 1,976 | 1,976 | ||||||
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net | 1,245 | 1,432 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, deposits and other assets | 631 | 674 | ||||||
Total other assets | 19,588 | 21,638 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 46,723 | $ | 38,278 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 3,910 | $ | 5,166 | ||||
Notes payable – current portion | 4,386 | 1,840 | ||||||
Operating lease liability – current portion | 410 | 388 | ||||||
Deferred revenue - current portion | 500 | 500 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 9,206 | 7,894 | ||||||
Earn-out milestone liability | 6,015 | 5,718 | ||||||
Notes payable | 5,611 | 7,963 | ||||||
Operating lease liability | 933 | 1,144 | ||||||
Deferred revenue and other liabilities | 750 | 1,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 22,515 | 23,719 | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
Common stock | 332 | 232 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 324,870 | 304,886 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss) | 8 | 43 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (300,917 | ) | (290,517 | ) | ||||
24,293 | 14,644 | |||||||
Less: Treasury stock | (85 | ) | (85 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 24,208 | 14,559 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 46,723 | $ | 38,278 |
# # #
FAQ
What are the financial results for Celsion in Q2 2020?
What is the status of the Phase II OVATION 2 Study?
What recommendation did the DMC make regarding the OPTIMA Study?
How much cash does Celsion have for its operations?