BeiGene Presents Results from Phase 3 Trial of Tislelizumab in Nasopharyngeal Cancer at ESMO Immuno-Oncology Congress 2021
BeiGene announced results from the RATIONALE 309 trial, where its drug tislelizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (RM-NPC) compared to placebo and chemotherapy. The median PFS was 9.2 months for the drug combination versus 7.4 months for placebo, demonstrating a notable survival benefit across subgroups. The safety profile was consistent with known risks, and a supplemental biologics license application is under review in China for this indication.
- Statistically significant PFS benefit of 9.2 months (tislelizumab) vs 7.4 months (placebo).
- PFS rate at 12 months: 35.7% (Arm A) vs 12.2% (Arm B).
- Potential new standard of care in China for RM-NPC.
- None.
In RATIONALE 309, tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival for patients, with survival benefit observed across patient subgroups
The safety profile of the combination was consistent with known risks of each treatment agent
Following the positive topline at an interim analysis, a supplemental biologics license application in this indication is currently under review in
“We are pleased that tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant progression-free survival benefit for patients with RM-NPC over chemotherapy,” commented
In
Results from RATIONALE 309: Tislelizumab vs. Placebo in Combination with Chemotherapy in First-Line RM-NPC
Proffered Paper: 121O
RATIONALE 309 is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 clinical trial (NCT03924986) designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin (Arm A) versus placebo combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin (Arm B) as a first-line treatment for patients with RM-NPC. The primary endpoint of the trial is progression-free survival (PFS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) per RECIST v1.1 criteria; secondary endpoints include IRC-assessed overall response rate (ORR), IRC-assessed duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), investigator-assessed PFS, time to second objective disease progression (PFS2), and safety. A total of 263 patients were enrolled in the trial, with 131 and 132 randomized to Arm A and Arm B, respectively, with balanced baseline characteristics between both arms.
“In the RATIONALE 309 trial, the addition of tislelizumab to chemotherapy significantly prolonged PFS for previously untreated patients with RM-NPC, an aggressive head and neck cancer prevalent in
As of
-
The median PFS was 9.2 months (
95% CI: 7.6, 10.1) in Arm A, compared to 7.4 months (95% CI: 5.6, 7.5) in Arm B, with a stratified hazard ratio (HR) of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.73) and stratified log-rank p < 0.0001, as assessed by IRC; -
The PFS rate at six, nine, and 12 months was
66.1% (95% CI 56.9, 73.8),51.0% (95% CI: 41.1, 60.1), and35.7% (95% CI: 25.2, 46.4) in Arm A, compared to53.0% (95% CI: 43.4, 61.8),21.6% (95% CI: 13.5, 30.9), and12.2% (95% CI: 5.6, 21.4) in Arm B, as assessed by IRC; -
The median PFS was 9.8 months (
95% CI: 7.8, 11.9) in Arm A, compared to 7.6 months (95% CI: 6.6, 7.8) in Arm B, with a stratified HR of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.76), as assessed by investigators; - Consistent PFS benefit was observed in most subgroups, including disease status, baseline liver metastases, and gender;
-
The ORR and complete response (CR) rate were
69.5% and16.0% in Arm A, compared to55.3% and6.8% in Arm B, as assessed by IRC; and -
The median DoR was 8.5 months (
95% CI: 6.5, NE), compared to 6.1 months (95% CI: 4.7, 6.2) as assessed by IRC.
The safety profile of tislelizumab and chemotherapy combination was manageable, consistent with known risks of each treatment agent. Safety results included:
-
All patients (
100% ) in Arm A experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of any grade, with the most common (≥20.0% ) being anemia, decreased white blood cell count, decreased neutrophil count, nausea, decreased platelet count, decreased appetite, vomiting, constipation, leukopenia, neutropenia, rash, hypothyroidism, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hyponatremia, increased blood creatinine, increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), malaise, and pyrexia; -
In comparison, 131 patients (
99.2% ) in Arm B experienced at least one TEAE of any grade, with the most common (≥20.0% ) being anemia, nausea, decreased white blood cell count, decreased platelet count, decreased neutrophil count, vomiting, decreased appetite, constipation, leukopenia, neutropenia, hyponatremia, malaise, hypokalemia, rash, increased AST, and hypoalbuminemia; -
Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported in 106 patients (
80.9% ) in Arm A, compared to 108 patients (81.8% ) in Arm B; -
Serious TEAEs were reported in 36 patients (
27.5% ) in Arm A, compared to 44 patients (33.3% ) in Arm B; -
TEAEs leading to permanent treatment discontinuation and death occurred in 2 patients (
1.5% ) and 5 patients (3.8% ), respectively, in Arm A, compared to 3 patients (2.3% ) and 2 patients (1.5% ), respectively, in Arm B; and -
In Arm A, 24 patients (
18.3% ) experienced at least one immune-mediated TEAE of any grade, including 3 patients (2.3% ) reporting Grade ≥3 events.
About Nasopharyngeal Cancer
Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is a malignant, squamous cell carcinoma which arises from the epithelial cells of the nasopharynx, most commonly originating in the pharyngeal recess (the fossa of Rosenmüller).1 There were an estimated 62,555 new cases of NPC in
About Tislelizumab
Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) is a humanized IgG4 anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody specifically designed to minimize binding to FcγR on macrophages. In pre-clinical studies, binding to FcγR on macrophages has been shown to compromise the anti-tumor activity of PD-1 antibodies through activation of antibody-dependent macrophage-mediated killing of T effector cells. Tislelizumab is the first drug from BeiGene’s immuno-oncology biologics program and is being developed internationally as a monotherapy and in combination with other therapies for the treatment of a broad array of both solid tumor and hematologic cancers.
In addition, four supplemental Biologics License Applications for tislelizumab are under review by the
In the
In
Tislelizumab is not approved for use outside of
About the Tislelizumab Clinical Program
Clinical trials of tislelizumab include:
- Phase 3 trial comparing tislelizumab with docetaxel in the second- or third-line setting in patients with NSCLC (NCT03358875);
- Phase 3 trial comparing tislelizumab to salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL; NCT04486391);
- Phase 3 trial in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (NCT03967977);
- Phase 3 trial of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced squamous NSCLC (NCT03594747);
- Phase 3 trial of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC (NCT03663205);
- Phase 3 trial of tislelizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with NSCLC (NCT04379635);
- Phase 3 trial of tislelizumab combined with platinum and etoposide versus placebo combined with platinum and etoposide in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (NCT04005716);
- Phase 3 trial comparing tislelizumab with sorafenib as first-line treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; NCT03412773);
- Phase 2 trial in patients with previously treated unresectable HCC (NCT03419897);
- Phase 2 trial in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (NCT04004221);
- Phase 3 trial comparing tislelizumab with chemotherapy as second-line treatment for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC; NCT03430843);
- Phase 3 trial of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with ESCC (NCT03783442);
- Phase 3 trial of tislelizumab versus placebo in combination with chemoradiotherapy in patients with localized ESCC (NCT03957590);
- Phase 3 trial of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy versus placebo combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with gastric cancer (NCT03777657);
- Phase 2 trial of tislelizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory cHL (NCT03209973);
- Phase 2 trial in patients with MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors (NCT03736889); and
- Phase 3 trial of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy versus placebo combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NCT03924986).
BeiGene Oncology
About
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws, including statements regarding BeiGene’s plans for the development and potential regulatory approval and commercialization in
References
- Yu, M. C., & Yuan, J.-M. (2002). Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Seminars in Cancer Biology, 12(6), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1044579x02000858.
-
Globocan 2020. Available at https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/160-china-fact-sheets.pdf. Access
July 2021 . - Wu, L., Li, C., & Pan, L. (2018). Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A review of current updates. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 15(4), 3687–3692. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.5878.
- Liu, Y.-T., Dai, J.-J., Xu, C.-H., Lu, Y.-K., Fan, Y.-Y., Zhang, X.-L., Zhang, C.-X., & Chen, Y.-M. (2012). Greater intake of fruit and vegetables is associated with lower risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Chinese adults: A case-control study. Cancer Causes & Control: CCC, 23(4), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-9923-z.
- Perri, F., (2019). Management of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current perspectives. Onco Targets Ther, 12, 1583-1591. doi:10.2147/OTT.S188148.
-
Li, J.-X., Huang, S.-M., Wen, B.-X., & Lu, T.-X. (2014). Prognostic factors on overall survival of newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP, 15(7), 3169–3173. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.7.3169. -
Toumi, N., Ennouri, S., Charfeddine, I., Daoud, J., & Khanfir, A. (2020). Prognostic factors in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.05.022. -
Xu, Y., Huang, T., Mao, M., Zhai, J., & Chen, J. (2020). Metastatic Patterns and Prognosis of de novo Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in
the United States . The Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28983.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211210005022/en/
Investor Contact
+86 10-5895-8058
ir@beigene.com
Media Contact
+1 857-302-7596
media@beigene.com
Source:
FAQ
What were the results of the RATIONALE 309 trial for BGNE?
What is the significance of the PFS results in the RATIONALE 309 trial?
Is there a supplemental biologics license application for tislelizumab?
What is the safety profile of tislelizumab in the trial?