Booz Allen Hamilton Sued for Blatant Refusal to Follow Federal Antidiscrimination Laws and for Retaliating Against Employee with Disability
Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE: BAH) is facing a lawsuit for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Virginia Values Act. Filed by Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, the case centers around employee Deirdre N. Cosmann, who claims the firm failed to provide reasonable accommodations for her migraines, leading to her termination. The Complaint outlines a history of discrimination, including denial of telework benefits that were granted to other employees during the pandemic, and retaliatory actions from management. The lawsuit seeks damages for unlawful discrimination.
- None.
- Allegations of unlawful disability discrimination and retaliation against an employee.
- Failure to accommodate an employee's disability needs, despite prior approvals.
- Management's refusal to allow telework, leading to employee termination during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Potential damage to company reputation due to allegations of non-compliance with federal laws.
GREENBELT, Md., Aug. 16, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Yesterday Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, P.A., filed a Complaint (Cosmann v. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.) to hold national consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE: BAH) accountable for refusing to provide reasonable accommodations for an employee's disability, actively preventing her from seeking additional billable client projects, and then ultimately terminating her employment as a result. The lawsuit seeks relief for unlawful disability discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act as amended ("ADA") and the Virginia Values Act ("VVA").
The Complaint alleges the following: Plaintiff Deirdre N. Cosmann alleged in the Complaint that she was a long time, high performing employee of Defendant Booz Allen Hamilton, all until she encountered a new manager who did not want to accommodate her disability. Ms. Cosmann was diagnosed with migraines and required telework approximately six to eight days a month for her disability. Booz Allen granted this accommodation back in 2013, but in the Complaint, Ms. Cosmann alleges that when she moved on to a new project in June 2019 her new "Job Manager" refused to abide by the existing accommodation, despite Ms. Cosmann's disability needs and the fact that other employees on the project teleworked. Ms. Cosmann alleges in the Complaint that the Job Manager intentionally scrutinized her work, berated her in front of her client and colleagues, and demanded Ms. Cosmann show detailed activity logs of her time spent teleworking, a requirement not extended to any other teleworking employee. According to the Complaint, Ms. Cosmann continued to request accommodations for her disability and escalated the issue with official complaints to Booz Allen, but the company did not intervene. Ms. Cosmann alleges that Booz Allen removed her from her project and then refused to consider her for other jobs due to her need for telework.
According to Ms. Cosmann as detailed in the Complaint, when Booz Allen switched to full time telework due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, Booz Allen still did not accommodate, and denied Ms. Cosmann the telework benefits it provided to all other employees. Booz Allen allegedly insisted that Ms. Cosmann (and only Ms. Cosmann) could not work at Booz Allen jobs due to her need to telework, and unceremoniously terminated her in the midst of the pandemic.
As outlined in the Complaint, filed in federal court, Booz Allen's actions were in direct violation of the ADA. Additionally, Booz Allen blatantly disregarded its commitment to The Federal Procurement Policy, which "permit[s] telecommuting by employees of Federal Government contractors in the performance of contracts entered into with executive agencies," and Booz Allen's obligations under the Federal Acquisition Regulations, which state that a federal "agency shall generally not discourage a contractor from allowing its employees to telecommute in the performance of Government contracts." Booz Allen also did not abide by its Contract and Preliminary Work Statement with the federal government (Ms. Cosmann's client), which did not prohibit telework.
"Booz Allen repeated denial of Ms. Cosmann's requests for reasonable accommodations for her disability is nothing short of a blatant refusal to comply with federal anti-discrimination laws. Booz Allen failed Ms. Cosmann at every stage, from repeatedly denying her accommodations, allowing her Job Manager to retaliate against her, removing her from her project just two weeks after she finally got a formal reasonable accommodation in place, refusing to consider her for jobs because she needed episodic telework, and then terminating her due to her disability," said Michal Shinnar, Senior Counsel at Joseph Greenwald & Laake, PA, and co-counsel for Ms. Cosmann. "Booz Allen should have had systems in place to stop all of this misconduct and ensure its employee received equal treatment and accommodations. But, instead, Booz Allen at all levels condoned these blatant violations of the ADA. We believe a jury will agree that Booz Allen acted unlawfully and will award Ms. Cosmann with the proper damages."
"Booz Allen denied Ms. Cosmann the telework benefits it gave to other employees during the COVID-19 pandemic, removed her from a major contract despite protests from the client, refused to give her new work, and terminated her in early 2020 even when Booz Allen had instituted a company-wide policy to not lay off employees until July 2020," said Lenore Garon of the Law Office of Lenore Garon, PLLC, and co-counsel for the Plaintiff. "No employee should have been fired due to their need to occasionally telework for a disability at a time when everyone in the company was teleworking due to COVID-19. It is evident that Booz Allen Hamilton actively penalized and targeted Ms. Cosmann for her disability which is a clear violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act."
To learn more about Joseph, Greenwald & Laake's Labor and Employment practice, click here.
Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, P.A., is one of the most trusted law firms serving Washington, D.C., and the suburban Maryland area. For more than 50 years, our law firm has represented a variety of clients, including individuals, small businesses and multimillion-dollar corporations. From simple to complex legal needs, our law firm is prepared to deliver strategic solutions with high standards. Call or e-mail us at Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, P.A. to schedule a consultation with an experienced attorney. We offer reliable counsel on how best to proceed and what your rights and responsibilities are.
Media Contact:
Lauren Smith, MBA
media@jgllaw.com
(202) 656-1774
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/booz-allen-hamilton-sued-for-blatant-refusal-to-follow-federal-antidiscrimination-laws-and-for-retaliating-against-employee-with-disability-301606742.html
SOURCE Joseph Greenwald and Laake
FAQ
What are the allegations against Booz Allen Hamilton in the lawsuit filed on August 16, 2022?
How does the lawsuit impact Booz Allen Hamilton's reputation?
What legal acts are cited in the complaint against Booz Allen Hamilton?
What specific actions did Booz Allen Hamilton take against employee Deirdre N. Cosmann?
What was Booz Allen Hamilton's stance during the COVID-19 pandemic regarding telework?
