Supreme Court of Virginia Agrees to Hear Appian Petition to Reinstate $2.036 Billion Verdict Against Pegasystems, Inc.
Appian (APPN) announced that the Supreme Court of Virginia will hear its petition to reinstate the $2.036 billion judgment against Pegasystems (Pega) for trade secret misappropriation. The court granted the petition on all four issues raised regarding errors made by the Court of Appeals.
The original verdict stemmed from evidence showing Pega employed a 'spy' to analyze Appian's software internals, improve their product, and generate billions in revenue. The jury's unanimous decision followed seven weeks of testimony and extensive documentation.
While the Supreme Court will also hear Pega's cross-appeal arguments regarding evidence sufficiency, these claims were previously rejected by both trial court and Court of Appeals. Notably, Pega's violation of the Virginia Computer Crimes Act remains confirmed as they declined to appeal this ruling.
Appian (APPN) ha annunciato che la Corte Suprema della Virginia ascolterà la sua petizione per ripristinare il giudizio di $2.036 miliardi contro Pegasystems (Pega) per appropriazione indebita di segreti commerciali. La corte ha accolto la petizione su tutte e quattro le questioni sollevate riguardo agli errori commessi dalla Corte d'Appello.
Il verdetto originale derivava da prove che dimostravano che Pega aveva impiegato un 'spia' per analizzare gli interni del software di Appian, migliorare il proprio prodotto e generare miliardi di entrate. La decisione unanime della giuria è seguita a sette settimane di testimonianze e documentazione estesa.
La Corte Suprema ascolterà anche gli argomenti di contro-appello di Pega riguardo alla sufficienza delle prove, ma queste affermazioni erano state precedentemente respinte sia dal tribunale di primo grado che dalla Corte d'Appello. È importante notare che la violazione da parte di Pega del Virginia Computer Crimes Act rimane confermata poiché hanno scelto di non appellarsi a questa sentenza.
Appian (APPN) anunció que la Corte Suprema de Virginia escuchará su petición para restablecer el juicio de $2.036 mil millones contra Pegasystems (Pega) por apropiación indebida de secretos comerciales. La corte aceptó la petición sobre los cuatro temas planteados en relación con los errores cometidos por la Corte de Apelaciones.
El veredicto original se basó en pruebas que mostraban que Pega empleó a un 'espía' para analizar los internos del software de Appian, mejorar su producto y generar miles de millones en ingresos. La decisión unánime del jurado siguió a siete semanas de testimonios y documentación extensa.
La Corte Suprema también escuchará los argumentos de contraapelación de Pega sobre la suficiencia de la evidencia, pero estas afirmaciones fueron previamente rechazadas tanto por el tribunal de primera instancia como por la Corte de Apelaciones. Es notable que la violación por parte de Pega de la Ley de Delitos Informáticos de Virginia sigue confirmada, ya que decidieron no apelar esta decisión.
Appian (APPN)은 버지니아 대법원이 Pegasystems (Pega)에 대한 20억 3600만 달러의 판결을 복원하기 위한 청원을 심리할 것이라고 발표했습니다. 법원은 항소법원이 저지른 오류와 관련하여 제기된 네 가지 문제에 대해 청원을 승인했습니다.
원래의 판결은 Pega가 Appian의 소프트웨어 내부를 분석하고 자사 제품을 개선하며 수십억 달러의 수익을 올리기 위해 '스파이'를 고용했다는 증거에 기반하고 있습니다. 배심원의 만장일치 결정은 7주간의 증언과 방대한 문서 작업에 따른 것입니다.
대법원은 또한 Pega의 증거 충분성에 대한 반대 항소 주장을 심리할 예정이지만, 이러한 주장은 1심 법원과 항소법원 모두에 의해 이전에 기각되었습니다. 특히 Pega가 버지니아 컴퓨터 범죄법을 위반한 사실은 확인된 상태이며, 이 판결에 대해 항소하지 않기로 결정했습니다.
Appian (APPN) a annoncé que la Cour suprême de Virginie examinera sa requête pour rétablir le jugement de 2,036 milliards de dollars contre Pegasystems (Pega) pour appropriation indue de secrets commerciaux. La cour a accordé la requête sur les quatre questions soulevées concernant les erreurs commises par la Cour d'appel.
Le verdict original provenait de preuves montrant que Pega avait employé un 'espion' pour analyser les internes du logiciel d'Appian, améliorer leur produit et générer des milliards de dollars de revenus. La décision unanime du jury a suivi sept semaines de témoignages et de documentation extensive.
La Cour suprême entendra également les arguments de contre-appel de Pega concernant la suffisance des preuves, mais ces revendications avaient été précédemment rejetées à la fois par le tribunal de première instance et la Cour d'appel. Il est à noter que la violation par Pega de la loi sur les crimes informatiques de Virginie reste confirmée, car ils ont choisi de ne pas faire appel de cette décision.
Appian (APPN) gab bekannt, dass der Oberste Gerichtshof von Virginia seinen Antrag auf Wiederherstellung des Urteils über 2,036 Milliarden Dollar gegen Pegasystems (Pega) wegen unrechtmäßiger Aneignung von Geschäftsgeheimnissen anhören wird. Das Gericht hat den Antrag zu allen vier angesprochenen Punkten bezüglich der Fehler des Berufungsgerichts genehmigt.
Das ursprüngliche Urteil basierte auf Beweisen, die zeigten, dass Pega einen 'Spion' eingesetzt hatte, um die interne Software von Appian zu analysieren, ihr Produkt zu verbessern und Milliarden von Dollar Umsatz zu generieren. Die einstimmige Entscheidung der Jury folgte auf sieben Wochen von Zeugenaussagen und umfangreicher Dokumentation.
Der Oberste Gerichtshof wird auch die Gegenargumente von Pega zur Beweissuffizienz anhören, diese Ansprüche wurden jedoch sowohl vom erstinstanzlichen Gericht als auch vom Berufungsgericht zuvor abgelehnt. Bemerkenswerterweise bleibt Pega's Verletzung des Virginia Computer Crimes Act bestätigt, da sie beschlossen haben, gegen dieses Urteil nicht Berufung einzulegen.
- Supreme Court of Virginia agreed to hear petition to reinstate $2.036B verdict
- Original jury verdict of willful trade secret misappropriation could be restored
- Pega's Virginia Computer Crimes Act violation remains confirmed and final
- Final outcome of appeals process remains uncertain
- Timeline for resolution is undefined
- Previous $2.036B judgment currently not in effect pending appeal
Insights
The Supreme Court of Virginia's decision to hear Appian's petition marks a significant development in this high-stakes trade secret litigation. The court agreeing to review all four issues raised in Appian's appeal suggests legitimate judicial interest in examining whether the Court of Appeals erred in overturning the massive
This represents a critical procedural victory for Appian, as most petitions for appeal are denied. Having their case heard by Virginia's highest court keeps alive the possibility of reinstating what would be one of the largest trade secret judgments in U.S. history. The court will now review whether legal errors occurred when the lower court reversed the jury's finding of willful and malicious misappropriation.
The stakes are extraordinarily high given that the potential judgment represents nearly 85% of Appian's current market capitalization. While Pega's cross-appeal will also be heard, it's noteworthy that their arguments regarding evidence sufficiency have already been rejected twice by lower courts.
It's particularly significant that Pega's violation of the Virginia Computer Crimes Act stands confirmed and final, providing Appian a partial victory regardless of this appeal's outcome. However, investors should recognize that supreme court proceedings typically take months to resolve, with no guarantee of success despite this procedural win.
This legal development creates a substantial upside opportunity for Appian shareholders. The potential reinstatement of a
If ultimately successful, such a recovery would dramatically strengthen Appian's balance sheet, potentially enabling accelerated R&D investment, strategic acquisitions, or even capital returns to shareholders. The company currently holds about
While legal proceedings of this magnitude typically face years of appeals and potential settlement negotiations, the mere possibility of recovery creates a valuable "lottery ticket" component to Appian's valuation. The market appears to be heavily discounting the likelihood of full recovery, creating an asymmetric risk-reward scenario for investors.
The Virginia Supreme Court accepting all four petition arguments signals more than a procedural formality. Though final outcomes remain uncertain, this development substantially increases the probability of at least partial reinstatement of damages. Investors should view this as incrementally positive while recognizing that legal timelines remain unpredictable and final resolution could still be years away.
Appian originally brought the case to trial to ensure the protection of its intellectual property, including its trade secrets. The unanimous verdict from the jury was based on seven weeks of testimony from dozens of witnesses and thousands of pages of evidence introduced to show that Pegasystems employed a "spy" to analyze the inner workings of Appian's software, improve its own product, and generate billions of dollars in revenue based on its misappropriation.
"We are encouraged that the Supreme Court of
The Supreme Court also agreed to hear Pega's cross-appeal issues, which presented arguments regarding the sufficiency of the evidence of trade secret misappropriation. Those arguments have been rejected by both the trial court and the Court of Appeals. The
The petition will be subject to further briefing and argument in front of the Supreme Court of
Learn more about the Appian and Pega case here: https://appian.com/pega-verdict
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release includes forward-looking statements. All statements contained in this press release other than statements of historical facts, including statements regarding Appian's ability to collect on the judgment, the outcome of any appeal, and the timing of such matters, are forward-looking statements. All aspects of the case could be subject to further appeal by Appian or Pegasystems. Appian cannot predict the outcome of any appeals or the time it will take to resolve them. The words "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "will," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the risks and uncertainties set forth in the "Risk Factors" section of Appian's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2025 and other reports that Appian has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Appian is under no duty to update any of these forward-looking statements after the date of this press release to conform these statements to actual results or revised expectations, except as required by law.
About Appian
Appian is The Process Company. We deliver a software platform that helps organizations run better processes that reduce costs, improve customer experiences, and gain a strategic edge. Committed to client success, we serve many of the world's largest companies across industries. For more information, visit appian.com. [Nasdaq: APPN]
Follow Appian: LinkedIn, X (Twitter)
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/supreme-court-of-virginia-agrees-to-hear-appian-petition-to-reinstate-2-036-billion-verdict-against-pegasystems-inc-302395975.html
SOURCE Appian
FAQ
What is the current status of Appian's $2.036 billion lawsuit against Pegasystems?
What were the original allegations in APPN's lawsuit against Pegasystems?
Has Pegasystems been found guilty of any charges in the Appian case?
What is the next step in APPN's legal proceedings against Pegasystems?
