Asbury Automotive Denies Unfounded FTC Allegations, Vows a Vigorous Defense
Asbury Automotive Group (NYSE: ABG) has rejected allegations by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) against three of its Dallas-Ft. Worth area dealerships. The FTC claims these dealerships sold protection products without customer consent and discriminated against minorities. Asbury denies these accusations, stating that customers received full disclosure and signed for protection products. The company emphasizes its compliance procedures, including independent deal clerk reviews.
Asbury CEO David W. Hult affirmed the company's commitment to customer protection and service. The company plans to contest the FTC's lawsuit, confident in its practices and the absence of consumer complaints. Asbury also refutes claims of discrimination, highlighting its diverse workforce and commitment to fair lending practices. The company vows to defend its reputation and resist any coercion for fines or requirements that could negatively impact customer experience.
Asbury Automotive Group (NYSE: ABG) ha respinto le accuse della Federal Trade Commission (FTC) contro tre dei suoi concessionari nella zona di Dallas-Ft. Worth. La FTC sostiene che questi concessionari hanno venduto prodotti di protezione senza il consenso dei clienti e hanno discriminato le minoranze. Asbury nega queste accuse, dichiarando che i clienti hanno ricevuto piena informativa e hanno firmato per i prodotti di protezione. L'azienda sottolinea le sue procedure di conformità, inclusi i controlli da parte di impiegati indipendenti.
Il CEO di Asbury, David W. Hult, ha affermato l'impegno dell'azienda per la protezione e il servizio al cliente. L'azienda prevede di contestare la causa della FTC, fiduciosa nelle proprie pratiche e nell'assenza di reclami da parte dei consumatori. Asbury rifiuta anche le accuse di discriminazione, evidenziando la sua forza lavoro diversificata e l'impegno per pratiche di prestito eque. L'azienda si impegna a difendere la propria reputazione e a resistere a qualsiasi coercizione per multe o requisiti che potrebbero avere un impatto negativo sull'esperienza dei clienti.
Asbury Automotive Group (NYSE: ABG) ha rechazado las acusaciones de la Comisión Federal de Comercio (FTC) contra tres de sus concesionarios en el área de Dallas-Ft. Worth. La FTC afirma que estos concesionarios vendieron productos de protección sin el consentimiento del cliente y que discriminaron a las minorías. Asbury niega estas acusaciones, afirmando que los clientes recibieron plena información y firmaron para los productos de protección. La empresa enfatiza sus procedimientos de cumplimiento, que incluyen revisiones de concesionarios independientes.
El CEO de Asbury, David W. Hult, afirmó el compromiso de la empresa con la protección y el servicio al cliente. La empresa planea impugnar la demanda de la FTC, confiada en sus prácticas y en la ausencia de quejas de los consumidores. Asbury también refuta las reclamaciones de discriminación, destacando su fuerza laboral diversa y su compromiso con prácticas de préstamos justas. La empresa se compromete a defender su reputación y resistir cualquier coerción para multas o requisitos que puedan afectar negativamente la experiencia del cliente.
Asbury Automotive Group (NYSE: ABG)는 댈러스-포트워스 지역의 세 개 딜러를 상대로 한 연방거래위원회(FTC)의 주장을 거부했습니다. FTC는 이들 딜러가 고객의 동의 없이 보호 제품을 판매하고 소수 인종을 차별했다고 주장합니다. Asbury는 이러한 주장을 부인하며, 고객이 완전한 공지를 받았고 보호 제품에 서명했다고 밝혔습니다. 회사는 독립적인 거래직원 검토를 포함한 준수 절차를 강조합니다.
Asbury의 CEO인 David W. Hult는 고객 보호와 서비스에 대한 회사의 헌신을 확인했습니다. 회사는 FTC의 소송에 맞설 계획을 세우고 있습니다. 고객 불만이 없다는 사실에 자신감을 가집니다. Asbury는 또한 차별 주장을 반박하며 다양한 인력과 공정한 대출 관행에 대한 헌신을 강조합니다. 회사는 자신의 명성을 방어하고 고객 경험에 부정적인 영향을 줄 수 있는 벌금이나 요구 조건에 대한 압박을 저항할 것이라고 다짐합니다.
Asbury Automotive Group (NYSE: ABG) a rejetté les allégations de la Commission fédérale du commerce (FTC) concernant trois de ses concessionnaires dans la région de Dallas-Ft. Worth. La FTC allègue que ces concessionnaires ont vendu des produits de protection sans le consentement des clients et ont discrimé les minorités. Asbury nie ces accusations, affirmant que les clients ont reçu une information complète et ont signé pour les produits de protection. L'entreprise met l'accent sur ses procédures de conformité, y compris les revues indépendantes des employés de vente.
Le PDG d'Asbury, David W. Hult, a affirmé l'engagement de l'entreprise envers la protection des clients et le service client. L'entreprise prévoyait de contester la poursuite de la FTC, confiante dans ses pratiques et l'absence de plaintes des consommateurs. Asbury conteste également les allégations de discrimination, mettant en avant sa main-d'œuvre diversifiée et son engagement envers des pratiques de prêt équitables. L'entreprise s'engage à défendre sa réputation et à résister à toute coercition pour des amendes ou des exigences pouvant affecter négativement l'expérience client.
Asbury Automotive Group (NYSE: ABG) hat die Vorwürfe der Federal Trade Commission (FTC) gegen drei ihrer Händler im Dallas-Ft. Worth-Gebiet zurückgewiesen. Die FTC behauptet, dass diese Händler Schutzprodukte ohne Einwilligung der Kunden verkauft und Minderheiten diskriminiert haben. Asbury bestreitet diese Anschuldigungen und erklärt, dass die Kunden vollumfänglich informiert wurden und für die Schutzprodukte unterschrieben haben. Das Unternehmen hebt seine Einhaltungsverfahren hervor, zu denen auch unabhängige Überprüfungen durch Deal-Klärt gehören.
Asbury-CEO David W. Hult bekräftigte das Engagement des Unternehmens für den Schutz und die Betreuung der Kunden. Das Unternehmen plant, die Klage der FTC anzufechten und ist überzeugt von seinen Praktiken und dem Fehlen von Verbraucherbeschwerden. Asbury widerspricht auch den Diskriminierungsvorwürfen und hebt seine vielfältige Belegschaft sowie das Engagement für faire Kreditvergabeverfahren hervor. Das Unternehmen gelobt, seinen Ruf zu verteidigen und sich gegen jegliche Zwangsmaßnahmen zur Zahlung von Bußgeldern oder Anforderungen zu wehren, die negative Auswirkungen auf die Kundenerfahrung haben könnten.
- Asbury's strong stance in defending its business practices against FTC allegations
- Absence of consumer complaints against the dealerships from 2019 to spring 2023
- Implementation of thorough compliance procedures and training practices
- Diverse workforce reflecting the demographics of customers served
- FTC lawsuit alleging violations in the sale of 'add-on' products
- Potential reputational damage from discrimination allegations
- Legal costs and management time associated with contesting the FTC lawsuit
- Possible competitive disadvantage if subjected to additional requirements
Insights
The FTC's allegations against Asbury Automotive Group are serious and potentially damaging. The company's vigorous denial and commitment to contest the lawsuit indicate a high-stakes legal battle ahead. Key points to consider:
- Asbury's claim of no consumer complaints from 2019 to spring 2023 is significant, potentially weakening the FTC's case.
- The company's internal review and compliance procedures, including independent deal clerks, could serve as strong defense evidence.
- Asbury's refusal to settle suggests confidence in their position, but also risks higher penalties if they lose.
This case could have industry-wide implications for automotive retail practices and regulatory oversight. Investors should monitor the litigation closely, as the outcome could impact Asbury's reputation, operations and financial performance.
This legal challenge poses significant financial risks for Asbury Automotive Group. Key financial considerations include:
- Potential fines and penalties if found guilty, which could impact profitability.
- Legal costs associated with a prolonged court battle could be substantial.
- Possible reputational damage affecting future sales and customer trust, regardless of the outcome.
However, Asbury's strong market position (Fortune 500, 204 dealerships) provides a financial buffer. The company's
This legal battle could have broader implications for the automotive retail industry. Key market considerations:
- Increased regulatory scrutiny on 'add-on' product sales practices across the industry.
- Potential for industry-wide changes in how protection products are marketed and sold.
- Consumer trust issues may arise, affecting the entire sector.
Asbury's diverse leadership and DEI initiatives could become a differentiating factor in the market if they successfully defend against discrimination claims. The outcome of this case may set precedents for future regulatory actions and industry standards, potentially reshaping the competitive landscape in automotive retail.
After carefully reviewing the dealerships’ records, Asbury said it will contest the FTC’s lawsuit alleging violations related to the sale of what the FTC calls “add-on” products and will defend the dealerships’ sales practices.
The dealerships – David McDavid Ford of
Prior to finalizing sales, the dealerships take the additional, extraordinary step of requiring a compliance review by an independent deal clerk to ensure that protection products are sold with the buyer’s signed consent. The dealerships’ policies and training forbid the sale of protection products such as service contracts, maintenance plans, and interior-exterior protection without explicit, written approval from customers. If Asbury team members are found to have engaged in the sort of conduct alleged by the FTC, they are subject to disciplinary action, including termination.
FTC officials refused to provide the methodology they employed in making their allegations even though Asbury requested such information for several months. Asbury has verified through a Freedom of Information Act request that the FTC received no consumer complaints about the McDavid dealerships from 2019, the start of the period covered by the lawsuit, through late spring of this year.
“Asbury Automotive takes great pride in its compliance procedures and training practices, and firmly believes that we protect our guests and serve them well,” said David W. Hult, Asbury’s CEO. “We offer popular and reliable products that protect our guests and their families including roadside assistance for stranded motorists, coverage for maintenance and unexpected repairs, and protection from interior and exterior damage.”
Dan Clara, Senior Vice President of Operations, rejected the FTC’s assertion that minority customers were charged more for protection products than other customers. “Asbury is committed to non-discrimination and has implemented policies, training, and monitoring to ensure that our dealerships comply with standards on fair lending and equal credit opportunity,” Clara said. “I am proud that Asbury is one of the few companies in the industry that has a Chief Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Officer. In addition, the three dealerships in question are highly diverse, from the highest level of leadership to front-line staff workers, and in that way reflect the demographics of the guests they serve.”
Asbury CEO David Hult added, “We will not allow the FTC to coerce fines from us or subject us to onerous requirements that negatively impact the car-buying experience for our customers, would not apply to others, and would place us at a competitive disadvantage in the industry. We are confident that we will prevail in the litigation.”
For inquiries and information, visit https://investors.asburyauto.com/ftc.
About Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (NYSE: ABG), a Fortune 500 company headquartered in
For additional information, visit www.asburyauto.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical fact, and may include statements relating to goals, plans, objectives, beliefs, expectations and assumptions with respect to the lawsuit filed by the FTC, Asbury’s intentions with respect to challenging such lawsuit and the potential impact of such lawsuit, projections regarding Asbury's financial position, liquidity, results of operations, cash flows, leverage, market position, the timing and amount of any stock repurchases, and dealership portfolio, revenue enhancement strategies, operational improvements, projections regarding the expected benefits of Clicklane, management’s plans, projections and objectives for future operations, scale and performance, integration plans and expected synergies from acquisitions, capital allocation strategy, business strategy. These statements are based on management's current expectations and beliefs and involve significant risks and uncertainties that may cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, adverse outcomes with respect to current and future litigation and other proceedings, including, without limitation, the FTC lawsuit, our inability to realize the benefits expected from recently completed transactions; our inability to promptly and effectively integrate completed transactions and the diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business and regular business responsibilities; our inability to complete future acquisitions or divestitures and the risks resulting therefrom; any supply chain disruptions impacting our industry and business, market factors, Asbury's relationships with, and the financial and operational stability of, vehicle manufacturers and other suppliers, acts of God, acts of war or other incidents and the shortage of semiconductor chips and other components, which may adversely impact supply from vehicle manufacturers and/or present retail sales challenges; risks associated with Asbury's indebtedness and our ability to comply with applicable covenants in our various financing agreements, or to obtain waivers of these covenants as necessary; risks related to competition in the automotive retail and service industries, general economic conditions both nationally and locally, governmental regulations, legislation, including changes in automotive state franchise laws, and Asbury's ability to execute its strategic and operational strategies and initiatives, including its five-year strategic plan, Asbury's ability to leverage gains from its dealership portfolio, Asbury's ability to capitalize on opportunities to repurchase its debt and equity securities or purchase properties that it currently leases, and Asbury's ability to stay within its targeted range for capital expenditures. There can be no guarantees that Asbury's plans for future operations will be successfully implemented or that they will prove to be commercially successful.
These and other risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements are and will be discussed in Asbury's filings with the
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240816075350/en/
Investors & Reporters May Contact:
Joe Sorice
Manager, Investor Relations
(770) 418-8211
ir@asburyauto.com
Source: Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
FAQ
What allegations has the FTC made against Asbury Automotive Group (ABG)?
How is Asbury Automotive Group (ABG) responding to the FTC's lawsuit?
What compliance measures does Asbury Automotive Group (ABG) have in place?